Public Opinion 1.1.6.2: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{Public Opinion |toc=Public Opinion |zurück=Public Opinion 1.1.6.1 |vorwärts=Public Opinion 1.1.6.3 |englisch= The pragmatic value of this idea is that it i…“ |
(kein Unterschied)
|
Aktuelle Version vom 5. Dezember 2017, 19:36 Uhr
|
|
|
|
|
The pragmatic value of this idea is that it introduces a much needed refinement into the ancient controversy about nature and nurture, innate quality and environment. For the pseudo-environment is a hybrid compounded of "human nature" and "conditions." To my mind it shows the uselessness of pontificating about what man is and always will be from what we observe man to be doing, or about what are the necessary conditions of society. For we do not know how men would behave in response to the facts of the Great Society. All that we really know is how they behave in response to what can fairly be called a most inadequate picture of the Great Society. No conclusion about man or the Great Society can honestly be made on evidence like that. |
|
|
|
|
|
Quelle
Public Opinion, Walter Lippmann, 1922.